Can Philanthropy Shape Equity in the Arts?
President of Creative Capital Christine Kuan wrote an op-ed for Artnet | The Burns Halperin Report
Can Philanthropy Shape Equity in the Arts? 5 Questions to Consider When Making a Donation
Creating a more diverse art world must begin upstream from galleries and museums.
Artists are the free thinkers and the first movers of culture, and culture is the basis of belief and action. To support an artist’s idea—to help realize new work—is to set into motion a new worldview. This is the exciting role philanthropy can play in creating a freer, more sustainable, and equitable society.
Today, the narratives that shape our laws, policies, and daily life are disproportionately dominated by a subset of the population. From museums and the art market to Hollywood, the old story remains that only a small percentage of artists represented are women and artists of color. White men make up 30 percent of the U.S. population, but represent most museum acquisitions, art market sales, and Hollywood film directors. Yet, museums, auction houses, and cinemas are downstream from the primary issue, which is: Who gets funded to make art?
It is not possible for museums to collect, galleries to exhibit, auction houses to sell, or cinemas to screen work by more diverse artists if women, artists of color, LGBTQIA+ artists, and artists with disabilities do not get the funding they need to create new work in the first place.
There are numerous structural barriers to artists getting funding—from not having opportunities through expensive MFA programs to not being able to bring a collector base to a gallery. That’s why one significant way we can support a more inclusive and plural arts ecosystem through philanthropy is by directly funding artists—especially Black, Indigenous, Asian, Latinx, women, LGBTQIA+ artists, and artists with disabilities. It is also vital to fund challenging new ideas, risk-taking work, and work where sometimes there is no “product” to be “consumed” or no commercial potential.
Creative Capital, where I serve as president and executive director, was founded in 1999 as an independent nonprofit in resistance to censorship when the NEA discontinued most of its grants to individual artists following controversies with Robert Mapplethorpe, Ron Athey, and others. With U.S. government funding, political opinion can dictate who gets funded and potentially jeopardize artistic freedom by only funding non-controversial artists.
Creative Capital believes artists are essential to advancing freedom of expression and democracy. Our grantmaking is done through a democratic, national, open-call process. Artists cannot be nominated; nomination processes generally exclude artists who do not have existing relationships with art establishment nominators. Our process further levels the playing field by seeking out the most innovative project ideas, not the most impressive resumes. We also offer producers and patrons the opportunity to support groundbreaking, early-stage projects.
Our transformative grantmaking—which funds any expense needed to advance the project, from studio space to childcare—has contributed to a more equitable and diverse arts ecosystem. In the 2022 cohort, 90 percent of grantees identify as Black, Indigenous, Asian, and Latinx; 57 percent are women, gender non-conforming/non-binary, and undisclosed; and 7 percent identify as having disabilities. In the past five years, Creative Capital has funded more than 75 percent artists of color.
Our grantees continue to define the field with their success, from Simone Leigh, the first Black woman to represent the United States at this year’s Venice Biennale, to Nikyatu Jusu, who won the Sundance Grand Jury Prize for her first feature film Nanny. Many of our grantee projects grapple with urgent issues and erased histories, such as Viva Ruiz’s project on reproductive justice, Thank God for Abortion Telenovela Pilot; Xavier Cortada’s The Underwater, which activates citizens to address dire flooding in Florida; and Germane Barnes’s Restructuring Blackness, which will research African diasporic legacies in architecture to design a new column order. These projects would have been difficult to finance through traditional TV, gallery, or museum systems.
Creative Capital’s model offers an instructive set of criteria for how funds can have a direct impact on artists. Here are five questions I think about in my work as a woman of color leading a fundraising organization that you may wish to consider in order to support a more diverse art world.
- Does the nonprofit exhibit/collect/fund significant numbers of women, BIPOC artists, LGBTQIA+ artists, and artists with disabilities? For example, a contemporary art museum exhibiting less than one percent artists of color a year is not going to meaningfully diversify the arts ecosystem. You can look up exhibition history on a museum website.
- Does the nonprofit have a multi-year track record of supporting diverse artists? Nonprofits may jump onto a trend one year and gain a lot of press but might move away from that cause later. It’s important to see that there is a demonstrated multi-year commitment.
- Does the grant maker have an open process of selecting artists, or what is the process of grantmaking? The grantmaking process is usually described on the website. If it is not described, that is also an issue of transparency to consider.
- Does a high percentage of your donation go to artists’ programs, rather than administration/development? If more than 50 percent of the annual budget is spent on administration and development, that means that most of the money is not going to artists. You can find this information on a nonprofit’s Form 990, which is publicly accessible online.
- Does the nonprofit have diverse individuals at every level of the organization? You can check a nonprofit’s website to learn more about their trustees, leadership, and staff.
Each year, Creative Capital fundraises every dollar we give away to artists. This year, 83 percent of every dollar was spent on artists’ grants and programs. Consider making a gift to artist-centered nonprofits that are doing this important, grassroots work.
This article was published in artnet on December 22, 2022.